Skip to content

Second-Order Condition

Proposition

Let a<ba < b be real numbers, and let f ⁣:(a,b)→Rf \colon (a, b) \to \mathbb{R} be a function which is twice-differentiable at its stationary point x0∈(a,b).x_0\in(a,b)\text{.} Then x0x_0 is a local maximum point of ff if f′′(x0)<0,f''(x_0)<0\text{,} and it is a local minimum point of ff if f′′(x0)>0.f''(x_0)>0\text{.}


Interpretation

The second-order condition decides what kind of stationary point x0x_0 is from the sign of f′′(x0)f''(x_0). At a stationary point the tangent is horizontal; f′′(x0)<0f''(x_0)<0 means that the graph bends downwards there, giving a local maximum, and f′′(x0)>0f''(x_0)>0 means that it bends upwards, giving a local minimum.

Three panels: a downward parabola with a local maximum where f'' is negative, an upward parabola with a local minimum where f'' is positive, and x cubed at 0, where f'' = 0 gives no conclusion.

The left and middle panels show the two decisive cases: a downward parabola with a local maximum and an upward one with a local minimum. In the right panel, x3x^3 has f′(0)=f′′(0)=0f'(0)=f''(0)=0 and no extremum at 00; the function x4x^4 has the same values f′(0)=f′′(0)=0f'(0)=f''(0)=0 and a minimum. So f′′(x0)=0f''(x_0)=0 gives no conclusion either way.

The figure marks every stationary point and its sign of f′′f''. The example 2x4−13x62x^4-\frac13x^6 has f′′(0)=0f''(0)=0, so the condition is silent there, as are x3x^3 and x4x^4 at 00, one without and one with an extremum.

The reason lies in the sign of f′f' near x0x_0. Since f′(x0)=0f'(x_0)=0, the difference quotient of f′f' is f′(x)/(x−x0)f'(x)/(x-x_0), and it tends to f′′(x0)f''(x_0). If f′′(x0)>0f''(x_0)>0, then close to x0x_0 we have f′<0f'<0 on the left and f′>0f'>0 on the right, so ff decreases and then increases: a local minimum. The condition only applies at stationary points, found with the first-order condition; a positive second derivative at a point where f′≠0f'\neq0 says nothing about extrema.

The conclusion is local. If f′′>0f''>0 on the whole interval, ff is strictly convex, and a stationary point is the global minimum. A common slip is to read the condition backwards: a local minimum does not force f′′(x0)>0f''(x_0)>0, as x4x^4 shows; what does hold at a local minimum of a twice differentiable function is f′′(x0)≥0f''(x_0)\ge0. Math IV extends the test to functions of several variables in the conditions for unconstrained extrema.


Key Results

  • A negative second derivative indicates local maximality.
  • A positive second derivative indicates local minimality.
  • A zero second derivative indicates that further analysis is needed.
  • The condition is sufficient but not necessary.

Examples

  • The function f(x)=2x4−13x6f(x)=2x^4-\frac{1}{3}x^6 has three stationary points x=0,x=0\text{,} x=2,x=2\text{,} and x=−2.x=-2\text{.} We plug x=0,x=0\text{,} 2,2\text{,} and −2-2 in f′′(x)=24x2−10x4f''(x)=24x^2-10x^4 to find f′′(2)=f′′(−2)=−64<0f''(2)=f''(-2)=-64<0 and f′′(0)=0.f''(0)=0\text{.} Then, we conclude that x=2x=2 and x=−2x=-2 are local maximum points. The condition gives no conclusion at x=0,x=0\text{,} but directly f(x)=x4(2−13x2)≥0=f(0)f(x)=x^4\left(2-\frac{1}{3}x^2\right)\ge0=f(0) for ∣x∣≤6,|x|\le\sqrt{6}\text{,} so x=0x=0 is a local minimum point.

Prerequisites

Sources

Aliases: SOC, second order condition, second-order sufficient condition Keywords: second derivative test Symbols: element of, real numbers, square root

Last updated: 20 October 2026 03:02