Skip to content

Uniqueness of Moment Generating Functions

Theorem

If the MGFs of XX and YY are finite and equal, MX(t)=MY(t)M_X(t)=M_Y(t), on an open interval around 00, then XX and YY have the same distribution.

A Moment Generating Function is the exponential expectation MX(t)=E[etX]M_X(t)=\mathbb{E}[\mathrm{e}^{tX}]. Its finiteness on a neighbourhood of zero is essential to the uniqueness conclusion; matching a finite number of derivatives is not enough.


Interpretation

Two MGFs that are finite and agree on an open interval around zero identify the same distribution. Once an MGF has been computed, it is therefore enough to recognize it as the MGF of a known distribution; this is how independent sums and shifted and scaled variables are identified.

On a logarithmic scale, the MGFs of Poisson(3) and of the normal distribution with mean 3 and variance 3, which touch at t = 0 but separate on either side.

The Poisson and normal laws shown both have mean 33 and variance 33, so their MGFs have the same value and the same first two derivatives at t=0t=0, where the curves touch. Away from 00 they separate: at t=1t=1 the Pois⁡(3)\operatorname{Pois}(3) MGF is e3(e−1)≈173\mathrm{e}^{3(\mathrm{e}-1)}\approx173 and the N(3,3)\mathcal{N}(3,3) MGF is e4.5≈90\mathrm{e}^{4.5}\approx90. Already the third derivatives at 00 differ, since E[X3]=57\mathbb{E}[X^3]=57 for the Poisson law and 5454 for the normal law. Agreement of a few derivatives is not enough; the whole function near 00 must match.

Both parts of the hypothesis matter. Equality at t=0t=0 alone is automatic, since every MGF equals 11 there. The MGFs must also be finite near zero: for the lognormal distribution the MGF is infinite for every t>0t>0, and then the theorem gives no information.

The theorem concerns distributions only. Equal MGFs do not make the variables equal as outcomes, nor independent: for X∼N(0,1)X\sim\mathcal{N}(0,1), the variable −X-X has the same MGF et2/2\mathrm{e}^{t^2/2}, yet −X≠X-X\neq X whenever X≠0X\neq0.


Key Results

  • Equality on an open interval containing zero is sufficient; equality only at zero is not.
  • Matching a computed MGF to a known MGF identifies the distribution under the same finiteness condition.

Examples

  • If MX(t)=exp⁡(3(et−1))M_X(t)=\exp(3(\mathrm{e}^t-1)) near zero, then X∼Pois⁡(3)X\sim\operatorname{Pois}(3).
  • If MX(t)=e2t+9t2/2M_X(t)=\mathrm{e}^{2t+9t^2/2} near zero, then X∼N(2,9)X\sim\mathcal{N}(2,9), with variance 99.

Prerequisites

Sources

Aliases: MGF uniqueness theorem, uniqueness of the MGF

Last updated: 20 October 2026 03:02