Skip to content

Convergence in Distribution

Definition

A sequence of random variables XnX_n converges in distribution to XX if the CDFs of the XnX_n converge to the CDF of XX wherever the latter is continuous:

FXn(x)→FX(x)\begin{aligned} F_{X_n}(x)\to F_X(x) \end{aligned}

for every point xx at which FXF_X is continuous. This is written as Xn→dXX_n\xrightarrow{d}X. Convergence at the jump points of FXF_X is not required, and the variables may be defined on different probability spaces (different sample spaces with their own probability functions), because only their CDFs are compared.

For each continuity point of the limiting CDF, take an ordinary Limit of a Sequence of numbers FXn(x)F_{X_n}(x). The input xx stays fixed while the random-variable index grows.


Interpretation

Convergence in distribution says that probabilities computed from XnX_n approach those computed from XX: P(Xn≤x)≈P(X≤x)\mathbb{P}(X_n\le x)\approx\mathbb{P}(X\le x) for large nn. Only the distributions are compared, through their CDFs; the values of XnX_n need not approach the values of XX along any sample path.

Step-shaped CDFs of X n = 1/n for n = 1, 2 and 4, each jumping from 0 to 1 at 1/n, approaching the step at 0 of the limit; at the jump point itself the values do not converge.

The figure shows the CDFs of the constants Xn=1/nX_n=1/n for n=1,2,4n=1,2,4, each a step from 00 to 11 at 1/n1/n. The steps move towards the step at 00 of the limit X=0X=0, so FXn(x)→FX(x)F_{X_n}(x)\to F_X(x) for every x≠0x\ne0. At the jump point x=0x=0 itself, FXn(0)=0F_{X_n}(0)=0 for every nn while FX(0)=1F_X(0)=1.

Raise nn and watch the CDF of ZnZ_n close in on Φ\Phi. For a discrete start the CDF keeps its jumps, yet the largest gap still shrinks.

This example explains why the definition only asks for convergence where FXF_X is continuous. The numbers 1/n1/n certainly approach 00, and any reasonable notion of convergence should allow it; demanding convergence at the jump as well would exclude this example. For a continuous limit such as N(0,1)\mathcal{N}(0,1) every point is a continuity point, so the CDFs must converge everywhere, which is the form used in the central limit theorem.

Convergence in distribution is the weakest of the three modes of convergence on these pages. In the second Example, Xn=(−1)nZX_n=(-1)^nZ has the law of ZZ for every nn, so it converges in distribution to ZZ, yet XnX_n keeps switching between ZZ and −Z-Z. A statement Xn→dXX_n\xrightarrow{d}X therefore says nothing about Xn−XX_n-X being small, except when the limit is a constant, where it implies convergence in probability.


Key Results

  • Convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution.
  • Convergence in distribution to a constant cc implies convergence in probability to cc.

Examples

  • If Xn=1/nX_n=1/n, its CDF converges to the CDF of the constant 00 at every continuity point x≠0x\ne0, so Xn→d0X_n\xrightarrow{d}0.
  • For Z∼N(0,1)Z\sim\mathcal{N}(0,1) and Xn=(−1)nZX_n=(-1)^nZ, every XnX_n has the law of ZZ, so Xn→dZX_n\xrightarrow{d}Z, but XnX_n does not converge in probability to ZZ: odd-index differences are 2∣Z∣2|Z|.

Prerequisites

Sources

Aliases: convergence in law, weak convergence, distributional convergence Symbols: phi

Last updated: 20 October 2026 03:02