Skip to content

Poisson Merging

Theorem

If X∼Pois⁡(λ1)X\sim\operatorname{Pois}(\lambda_1) and Y∼Pois⁡(λ2)Y\sim\operatorname{Pois}(\lambda_2) are independent, then X+Y∼Pois⁡(λ1+λ2)X+Y\sim\operatorname{Pois}(\lambda_1+\lambda_2). Independence is needed: Poisson marginals alone do not make the sum Poisson.

The Poisson Distribution has MGF eλ(et−1)\mathrm{e}^{\lambda(\mathrm{e}^t-1)}. Multiplying the MGFs of the independent counts adds their parameters, identifying the law of the total.


Interpretation

Independent Poisson sources combine into a Poisson total whose parameter is the sum of the source parameters. Counting two independent streams of events together gives a count of the same kind, with the means added.

Three timelines over one time unit: arrivals of a Poisson(3) count, arrivals of an independent Poisson(7) count, and both sets merged on one line as a Poisson(10) count.

Over one time unit, the blue arrivals form a Pois⁡(3)\operatorname{Pois}(3) count and the red arrivals an independent Pois⁡(7)\operatorname{Pois}(7) count. Placing both on one line gives the merged count X+Y∼Pois⁡(10)X+Y\sim\operatorname{Pois}(10); in this sample there are 3+7=103+7=10 arrivals. The merged line no longer records which source an arrival came from.

The proof is a short MGF computation: multiplying the MGFs gives eλ1(et−1)eλ2(et−1)=e(λ1+λ2)(et−1)\mathrm{e}^{\lambda_1(\mathrm{e}^t-1)}\mathrm{e}^{\lambda_2(\mathrm{e}^t-1)}=\mathrm{e}^{(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)(\mathrm{e}^t-1)}, and uniqueness identifies Pois⁡(λ1+λ2)\operatorname{Pois}(\lambda_1+\lambda_2). A direct check sums over the ways to split a total nn into kk and n−kn-k; the binomial theorem then gives

∑k=0nλ1kk! λ2n−k(n−k)!=(λ1+λ2)nn!.\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{\lambda_1^k}{k!}\,\frac{\lambda_2^{n-k}}{(n-k)!}=\frac{(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)^n}{n!}.

Independence is essential. If X∼Pois⁡(λ)X\sim\operatorname{Pois}(\lambda) and Y=XY=X, both counts are Poisson, but X+Y=2XX+Y=2X takes only even values, so it is not Poisson. Merging and Poisson splitting describe the same situation from two sides: given the total X+Y=nX+Y=n, each of the nn items comes from the first source with probability λ1/(λ1+λ2)\lambda_1/(\lambda_1+\lambda_2), independently, which is the binomial statement in the Key Results.


Key Results

  • For finitely many independent Poisson variables, ∑iXi∼Pois⁡(∑iλi)\displaystyle \sum_iX_i\sim\operatorname{Pois}(\sum_i\lambda_i).
  • For XX and YY as in the theorem, X∣X+Y=n∼Bin⁡(n,λ1/(λ1+λ2))X\mid X+Y=n\sim\operatorname{Bin}(n,\lambda_1/(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)).

Examples

  • Independent arrival counts with means 33 and 77 combine to a Pois⁡(10)\operatorname{Pois}(10) count.
  • Two independent counts with means 22 and 44 have total-zero probability e−2e−4=e−6\mathrm{e}^{-2}\mathrm{e}^{-4}=\mathrm{e}^{-6}.

Prerequisites

Sources

Aliases: sum of independent Poisson random variables Symbols: lambda, sum

Last updated: 20 October 2026 03:02