Skip to content

Likelihood for Truncated Loss Data


Definition

Under left truncation at dd, only losses satisfying X>dX>d enter the dataset. For independent exact observations drawn from that conditional population, the likelihood contribution is fθ(xi)/Fˉθ(d)f_\theta(x_i)/\bar F_\theta(d) for xi>dx_i>d, provided Fˉθ(d)>0\bar F_\theta(d)>0.


Interpretation

Small losses are absent altogether. The likelihood must renormalize the observed population; this differs from retaining small losses as censored observations.

Exponential density with rate 2/70 drawn dashed from 0, losses below d = 100 shaded as unobserved, and the renormalized density above 100 with the observations 120 and 150 marked.

The figure uses the fitted rate 2/702/70 from the Examples case. The dashed ground-up density fθf_\theta puts almost all of its mass below d=100d=100, where nothing is recorded. Dividing by Fˉθ(100)=e−20/7≈0.057\bar F_\theta(100)=\mathrm{e}^{-20/7}\approx0.057 lifts the part above 100 into a proper density on x>100x>100, and the observations 120 and 150 contribute its heights fθ(xi)/Fˉθ(d)f_\theta(x_i)/\bar F_\theta(d) to the likelihood. For the exponential law this conditional density is the original one shifted to start at dd, which is why only the excesses 20 and 50 enter the estimate.

An ordinary deductible produces a dataset of paid claims only when the loss exceeds dd. If recorded amounts are excesses, add dd back before evaluating the ground-up density, and divide by the exceedance probability to describe the selected population.


Key Results

  • ℓ(θ)=∑ilog⁡fθ(xi)−nlog⁡Fˉθ(d)\displaystyle \ell(\theta)=\sum_i\log f_\theta(x_i)-n\log\bar F_\theta(d) for a fixed observed sample size.
  • For observation restricted to (a,b](a,b], normalize by Fθ(b)−Fθ(a)F_\theta(b)-F_\theta(a).
  • If a deductible dataset reports excesses yi=Xi−dy_i=X_i-d, use fθ(yi+d)/Fˉθ(d)f_\theta(y_i+d)/\bar F_\theta(d).
  • Information about the total number of excluded losses would require an additional sampling model.

Examples

For exponential losses observed only above 100, observations 120 and 150 have excesses 20 and 50. The conditional maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) is 2/(20+50)=2/702/(20+50)=2/70, rather than 2/2702/270.


Prerequisites



Sources

Aliases: left truncation, deductible-conditioned sampling, truncated likelihood, truncated data likelihood, left-truncated data Keywords: f_θ(x_i)/F̄_θ(d), deductible data, excesses over the deductible, conditional MLE Symbols: sum, theta

Last updated: 17 October 2026 21:53