Skip to content

Second-Order Stochastic Dominance


Definition

For nonnegative integrable gain or wealth variables X,YX,Y, YY has second-order stochastic dominance over XX if ∫0tFX(s) ds≥∫0tFY(s) ds\int_0^tF_X(s)\,\mathrm{d}s\ge\int_0^tF_Y(s)\,\mathrm{d}s for every t≥0t\ge0. Equivalently, every increasing concave utility weakly prefers YY to XX, with expectations defined.


Interpretation

This comparison is stated for favourable outcomes. When the variables denote losses, put the minus sign inside wealth utility. A larger mean alone does not establish second-order dominance.

Integrated CDFs of a fair draw X of 0 or 2 and a certain gain Y = 1; the X curve lies above the Y curve up to t = 2, and the two curves coincide from there on.

The figure reads the Examples case as gains: XX is the fair draw of 0 or 2 and Y=1Y=1 is certain. Then ∫0tFX(s) ds=t/2\int_0^tF_X(s)\,\mathrm{d}s=t/2 for 0≤t≤20\le t\le2, while ∫0tFY(s) ds=(t−1)+\int_0^tF_Y(s)\,\mathrm{d}s=(t-1)_+ there; the shaded gap shows that the first integral is never below the second, which is the definition of YY dominating XX in second order. From t=2t=2 on both integrals equal t−1t-1, because once tt exceeds every outcome the integral equals tt minus the mean, and the means are equal.

Move the certain gain yy and the spread of XX: while y≥E[X]=1y\ge\mathbb E[X]=1 the integrated CDF of XX is never below that of Y=yY=y, so the certain gain dominates. Push yy below 1 and the curves cross.

Convex order and more dangerous risks compares dispersion at equal means. In that case Y≤cxXY\le_{\mathrm{cx}}X makes every concave utility prefer the gain YY, explaining the direction of the equal-mean second-order comparison.


Key Results

  • First-order dominance of YY over XX implies second-order dominance.
  • Dominance requires E[Y]≥E[X]\mathbb{E}[Y]\ge\mathbb{E}[X] for integrable variables.
  • At equal means, YY dominating XX in second order corresponds to Y≤cxXY\le_{\mathrm{cx}}X.
  • For losses, X≤slYX\le_{\mathrm{sl}}Y corresponds to preference for wealth w−Xw-X over w−Yw-Y by increasing concave utility.

Examples

As gains, a certain 1 second-order dominates a fair draw of 0 or 2. As losses, the same certain 1 is the less dangerous risk. The preference direction is the same after the outcome meaning is specified.


Prerequisites



Sources

Aliases: increasing concave order, second-order dominance of wealth, SSD, second-order dominance, second-degree stochastic dominance Keywords: integrated CDF, increasing concave utility, ∫_0^t F_X(s) ds ≥ ∫_0^t F_Y(s) ds, risk-averse preference, gains versus losses Symbols: integral

Last updated: 17 October 2026 21:53